Key Points
- A Federal court judge dismissed the main lawsuit against the SAVE Plan, State of Missouri v. Trump, because both sides now want the same outcome.
- While the preliminary injection blocking SAVE is now expired, borrowers should not expect any changes to the status quo immediately.
- Final timelines and decisions will be announced by the Department of Education.
A federal judge on Friday dismissed the central lawsuit challenging the Biden-era SAVE student loan repayment plan — not because the court endorsed it, but because there is no longer a dispute to decide.
The ruling clarifies the legal posture of the case but does not immediately end the administrative forbearance for the roughly 7 million borrowers enrolled in SAVE.
The decision (PDF FIle), issued by Judge John A. Ross of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, ends the case State of Missouri v. Trump without prejudice and rejects a joint request from the parties to vacate the SAVE rule outright.
The judge notes “that clarity must come from the Department of Education, and not from this Court, which is no longer empowered to weigh the merits of a case that is now moot.“
Would you like to save this?
What The Judge Actually Said
The lawsuit was originally filed in April 2024 by Missouri and other states challenging the Education Department’s 2023 rule creating the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) income-driven repayment plan.
In June 2024, the court found the states were likely to succeed on their claim that the Secretary of Education exceeded statutory authority in granting loan forgiveness through SAVE and entered a preliminary injunction blocking further loan forgiveness under the plan.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit later affirmed that injunction and instructed the district court to broaden it to block the entire SAVE rule, not just the forgiveness provisions. The district court complied in April 2025.
Then the political landscape shifted.
After a change in presidential administration, the federal defendants stopped defending the SAVE rule. On July 4, 2025, President Donald Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which the court said “effectively ends the SAVE plan, with a phasing out period”.
At that point, both Missouri and the federal government jointly asked the court to enter final judgment vacating the SAVE rule.
Judge Ross declined.
Under Article III of the Constitution, federal courts may only decide active “cases or controversies.” Because both sides now sought the same result and no longer had adverse legal positions, the court determined there was no live dispute to resolve.
The case was dismissed as moot.
This Is Not A Revival Of The SAVE Plan
Some early reaction suggested the dismissal clears the way for full reinstatement of SAVE benefits. The order itself tells a more restrained story.
The judge did not vacate the SAVE rule. He did not declare it lawful. He did not order the Department of Education to resume repayment or forgiveness under SAVE.
Instead, he concluded that because Congress has already passed legislation phasing out SAVE, and because the current administration no longer defends it, the court simply has no role left to play.
That language underscores a key point: future operational decisions now sit squarely with the executive branch.
The court’s order makes clear that the SAVE plan has already been addressed by Congress. That means SAVE’s long-term future is now governed by statute, not by litigation alone.
The practical result: even without this lawsuit, SAVE was already set on a wind-down path. The proposed settlement would have accelerated that process. The judge declined to rubber-stamp it.
So SAVE is neither abruptly dead nor fully restored. It remains subject to legislative phaseout and administrative implementation. Student loan expert Mark Kantrowitz sums it up best, “It’s a zombie and cannot be resurrected.“
“[SAVE] is a zombie and cannot be resurrected”
– Mark Kantrowitz
What This Means For The 7 Million Borrowers In SAVE Forbearance
In short, nothing.
Nothing new is happening for borrowers in the SAVE forbearance. Borrowers currently in forbearance will remain in forbearance until the Department of Education acts. Our current SAVE timeline estimates put the highest likelihood of repayment surrounding the launch of RAP this summer.
What borrowers should not assume:
- That payments will automatically restart immediately.
- That forgiveness will automatically be processed.
- That they must urgently switch plans.
The administrative forbearance remains in place until the Department of Education directs servicers otherwise. The judge explicitly signaled that implementation decisions now belong to the department.
Borrowers will eventually need to select a new repayment plan. Or, the Department of Education may undertake a negotiated rule-making session to automatically move borrowers.
Waiting is SAVE is likely not the best financial move, but there is no immediate urgency (as of publication) for that to happen.
What Happens Next
As of now, we’re simply waiting on the final timeline for when borrowers will have to leave the SAVE plan.
Things to watch:
- Department of Education issues guidance on Court Actions.
- Implementation rules for the statutory SAVE phaseout.
- Operational details of the new Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) launching July 1.
For now, the case is closed, and yes, SAVE is still ending. And annoyingly for borrowers, the final timeline is still uncertain.
Editor’s Note: We reached out to the Department of Education for comment, but as of publication, had not received a response.
Don’t Miss These Other Stories:
Editor: Colin Graves
The post Judge Dismisses SAVE Plan Lawsuit — SAVE Borrowers Still In Limbo appeared first on The College Investor.
